Saturday, 21 November 2009

A question to the hard Left...


Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez has defended jailed killer "Carlos the Jackal" and several world leaders he says are wrongly considered "bad guys".

In a speech to international socialist politicians, Mr Chavez said "Carlos", a Venezuelan, was not a terrorist but a key "revolutionary fighter". He is serving a life sentence in France for murders committed in 1975.

Mr Chavez also hailed Zimbabwe's Robert Mugabe, Iran's Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, and the late Ugandan dictator Idi Amin. [BBC]


...d'you ever wonder about the company you keep?

Labels:


Friday, 20 November 2009

Photo of the day - EU edition



Apologies if you've just had a heavy lunch.

Labels:


Climate change alarmism: a smoking gun? (UPDATED)


If this story is true, it is big:

The University of East Anglia's Hadley Climatic Research Centre appears to have suffered a security breach earlier today, when an unknown hacker apparently downloaded 1079 e-mails and 72 documents of various types and published them to an anonymous FTP server. These files appear to contain highly sensitive information that, if genuine, could prove extremely embarrassing to the authors of the e-mails involved. Those authors include some of the most celebrated names among proponents of the theory of anthropogenic global warming (AGW).

The emails purport to prove that climate change scientists have been hopelessly politicised, just as their critics allege: twisting or tweaking data to "fit the facts round the policy", shaping the message being sent out to news organisations (which routinely reprint such press releases as fact), and evading FOI requests from sceptics to release raw climate data, which the Hadley Centre (which is at the forefront of warmenist propagandising) has been doing for some time now.

From the point of view of climate sceptics, it's all too good to be true: proof of the "conspiracy" which excitable types like DK are fond of talking about. And, if it's all too good to be true, it probably is. Like Tim Blair (who has further links), I'd urge caution. There must be a significant chance that this is a hoax of some sort - the words "Hitler Diaries" have been bandied about a lot overnight - but, if so, it seems a very elaborate one: there are, apparently, more than 60MB of emails and other documents in the file, which is being spread around the web as we speak.

If it is not a hoax, on the other hand, and this correspondence is genuine, there will be some very embarrassed scientists out there today, and a lot of people with questions to answer; and the alarmist/hysteric wing of the climate change "debate" is about to take another big hit, if the MSM bother to report it.

UPDATE: The emails appear to be genuine (story in PDF).

UPDATE 2: The BBC is now running a piece of powder-puff churnalism confirming the breach in security, though of course not mentioning the potentially explosive nature of the correspondence. It's very much "move along, nothing to see here", naturally.

No way of knowing if all the emails are genuine, of course - but at this stage there is no evidence whatever to suggest that they are anything but.

Labels: ,


Heather Brooke is Reformer of the Year


I'm pleased to be able to pass on the news that the think-tank Reform have named Heather Brooke as their Reformer Of The Year for 2009, after she gained a Mugabe-esque 90% of the public vote.

Thankfully, with Parliament now embarking on the task of cleaning itself up, Heather is no longer needed; our MPs will take it from here, thanks very much.

What's that? Oh.

David Curry, the MP who heads the committee responsible for policing Commons expenses, has claimed almost £30,000 for a second home that his wife has banned him from staying in.


After learning of the Telegraph investigation, David Curry resigned as chairman of the Parliamentary Standards and Privileges Committee and now faces a formal inquiry into his claims.

The Conservative MP is accused of having an affair with a headmistress in his Yorkshire constituency and using a taxpayer-funded cottage to meet his lover.

I'm so glad we've been subsidising Mr Curry's knob-polishing, aren't you, reader? Yes, I think that Sir Thomas Page showed great wisdom when designing Westminster Bridge...


Labels: , ,


Thursday, 19 November 2009

Factoids of the day


Unsurprising:

Sales of extra-large condoms in Tesco are higher in Glasgow than anywhere else in Britain.

Surprising:

22 per cent of men “regularly include a kiss on texts to their male mates.”

You what?



(h/t: Prospect, where there are several more.)

Labels:


Wednesday, 18 November 2009

Beatrix: Potty


There's a quite glorious piece up at - where else? - Comment is Free today, written by Bea Campbell, former communist, Morning Star hack and promoter of Satanic abuse 'scandals', announcing her formal conversion to the Green Party, for whom she will contest a seat at the election.

Ms Campbell, a radical Marxist-feminist-gay-green activist and newly minted holder of the Order of the British Empire - you can read her tortuous apologia for accepting the "imperialist" award here - apparently thinks that her long personal journey from Marxist fellow-traveller (complete with state-subsidised propaganda holidays in Honecker's East Germany) to membership of the environmental movement will baffle the rest of us, when in fact it will come as little surprise to anyone who's been paying even scant attention.

But clearly some sort of explanation is called for, and as I said, boy, it's a doozy. There are far too many highlights to fisk the whole thing, so let's select a small handful:

Joining the Green party was a quiet, private moment.

This, to reiterate, is the opening line of a 700-word article for a national newspaper.

It was unusual for quite a loud politico like me, habituated to citizenship as a way of intervening, a mission to make a difference. It was a rather innocent gesture. Signing up. Some meetings maybe, some leafleting, some learning – as a non-geek,

- translation: I don’t understand any of this shit -

Green stuff carried the allure of rocket science and the promise of new enlightenment.

“The allure of rocket science”? I’m pretty sure we don’t Freud to decode that... how’s lesbianism working out for you, anyway?

I'd voted Green, probably in the way that many activists of my generation, who'd felt so busy and alert in the last quarter of the 20th century, had voted Liberal Democrat, Green, Respect sometimes, always to dissent from New Labour's combination of abject and authoritarian populism.

That’s correct, reader: Bea voted Green to dissent from authoritarianism.

My friends and family are typically left of centre

There’s a fucking shock.

[...] some vote Labour because they hate the Tories, some don't vote because they don't see the point, most sign up to something.

Gee, that’s some real shock troops of the revolution you’ve got gathered there, Lady GaGa. As long as you sign up to something, eh? Fight the power!

The communist states of the 20th century did for socialism. I was a dynastic communist –

- translation: I was a communist because my parents told me to be -

my parents were British Bolsheviks

Bingo.

[...] they were good citizens, and became better when Khrushchev gave permission to criticise Stalinism.

"Gave permission to criticise" says it all, really.

I remained a communist until 1989, when it was all over.

As a commenter below the piece notes, that's like saying you were a Nazi right up until the Russians stormed Berlin.

I was part of the anti-Stalinist, Euro-communist wing. We were clever, caused trouble, caught the imagination, but we lost. Or maybe we failed.

In order; no you weren’t, no you didn’t, don’t be ridiculous, and thank fuck.

But hold on, maybe I am being unkind. Because next comes a paragraph of such perfect construction that it is perhaps the most exquisitely unintelligible thing I've read this year:

But it was feminism that clarified the unsustainability of state communism. Macho, manic productionism relies on force, it valorises conquest of nature and other humans. It marginalises the means of reproduction – how societies sustain themselves, breathe, give birth, grow and rest, clean up; how people take care, give pleasure and co-operate. [...] Green ideology represents the reconciliation of production and reproduction – that is what yields sustainability.

If you understood even a word of that, you're a better man than I. Needless to say, the comments are an absolute joy.

Labels: ,


Corporate branding


An idea from America which might usefully be brought across the pond:

I’d like to see Americans get together and make sure that every state in the union has a referendum by 2012 that forces federal politicians to display their sponsorships. [...] The corporation or lobbyist or PAC that contributes the most to a politician is forced to put the biggest logo on the politician’s uniform. The smaller the contribution, the smaller the logo.


The politicians will be forced to wear the new uniforms whenever they’re are acting in an official capacity. So, they’d wear the uniforms on the floor of the Senate, House and inside the West Wing. They’d wear the uniform when appearing on television, on the campaign trail, at fund raising events and even state visits.

I want to see all the Senators who rail against health care reform do so with insurance company logos all over their expensive suits. I want to see the damned-near-monocled politicians who make the decisions about banking regulations do so with Goldman Sachs embroidered across their backs. And i damned sure want to see the names of the defense contractors on the wardrobes of all the soft-handed sons-of-bitches who send good men off to die without a damned good reason.

Dress them all up like the clowns that they’ve proven themselves — over and over — to be.

Of course, it would need a bit of tweaking to work here, but the idea of displaying donors' logos on their outfits is a compelling one, isn't it?

What would you make our MPs wear, reader?

Labels: , , , ,


"Break dance is something special. It is really a promotion of a healthy lifestyle."


I am grateful to a friend from Moscow for passing along this priceless clip from a TV talent contest on Russian TV. Even if you are not swayed by his sage words of advice for the gathered yoof, the sight of Vladimir Putin nodding along to Russian rap in a turtleneck is, I humbly suggest, one that will not soon leave your fevered memory.




Full story here. Do I really need to add that I would give everything I own to see Gordo perform a similar feat on X-Factor...?

Labels: , ,


Tuesday, 17 November 2009

A code of conduct for blogs, redux


Here's an article at Liberal Conspiracy that I can wholeheartedly endorse: a response to the new head of the Press Complaints Commission, Baroness Buscombe, who has suggested that blogs should in future come under the remit of the PCC.

[...] we would suggest that before your even consider turning your attention to our activities, you should direct your energies towards putting your own house in proper order. Should you succeed in raising the ethical standards and practices of the majority of the national press, particularly the tabloids, to our level then we may be inclined to reconsider our position. Until that happens, any attempt by the Press Complaints Commission to regulate the activities of bloggers will be strenuously resisted at every possible turn.

Needless to say my own reply would have contained a few more four-letter words, but Unity's is more than adequate. Fellow bloggers who share his (and my) disdain for the PCC are invited to add their names to the letter.

Labels: ,


Straws in the wind


"New resources will be necessary for the financing of the welfare state. Green tax instruments are a possibility, but they are ambiguous: This type of tax will eventually be extinguished.

But the possibilities of financial levies at European level must be seriously examined and for the first time the large countries in the union are open to that."

- Herman Van Rompuy, front-runner for the new job of EU President, November 12th

Grab your ankles, citizen.

Labels: ,


Via Don Paskini, I'm delighted to see that the Daily Mail Headline Generator has received a 2009 refit. Literally minutes of fun...

Labels:


Monday, 16 November 2009

Out-of-context quote of the day


Tim Worstall:

I was outed as a sex blogger three years ago.

Of course - as with so much else - Mr Eugenides was there first.

Labels: ,


On apologies


Another week, another apology from politicians for a mistake or evil from the past; this time it is the policy of sending underprivileged children from this country to the colonies, where they apparently often suffered abuse or exploitation as a result.

The only unifying theme for such apologies, it seems, is that the politician proferring the contrition is never apologising for his own conduct or mistake, but those of others. As Longrider notes:

There is something deeply disturbing about this hair-shirt-wearing, self-flagellating desire to proffer sanctimonious apologies for the sins of previous generations. Grow up and grow a spine.

Indeed. However, while we are in full agreement on the fairly pointless, gesture-politics nature of these apologies - particularly when, in Brown's case at least, there are plenty of mistakes of his own that might be a more useful topic for remorse - I disagree with Longrider when he says this:

How old was Gordon Brown then? Was he in government? The answers being that he was a teenager when this finished and he was not in government. Therefore, he has no right to apologise and neither has Kevin Rudd as neither of them was involved in the offence. An apology, to mean anything at all, must be proffered by the person or people who caused the original harm. You cannot apologise by proxy.

I don't think this is entirely true. In a liberal democracy, policies enacted by the State are carried out on our behalf and in our names, however vociferously we may oppose or dispute them. Furthermore, these policies have repercussions for all of us, not just the victims of a misguided policy or for that matter the politicians who promoted it. Institutions like slavery or colonialism continue to shape our relations with some countries; events like the Amritsar massacre in colonial India, or the bombing of Hiroshima, provoke strong reactions in those countries even now, and ones which affect those peoples' view of their nominal friends and allies.

Nations and peoples have powerful collective memories, or at least they used to before Simon Cowell destroyed Western civilisation. Try visiting Croke Park with Irish friends and I guarantee it will not be long before you are treated to an impromptu history lesson. "They came in from there, and started firing over there", they will say; but it's hard to shake the feeling that, perhaps by some quirk of the Dublin accent, they actually means you. Is this fair? Of course not; but they do it, all the same.

On a trivial level, I recall being harangued in an Athens street by an elderly Greek gentleman who shouted that Lord Elgin had stripped the Parthenon of its sculptures in order to pay for the expenses of his mistress. (I was seven or eight, and somewhat nonplussed.) On a rather more serious scale, the refusal of the Japanese to acknowledge the brutality of their wartime treatment of subject peoples and foreign prisoners of war is still a huge source of friction, not only in countries like China and Korea but to veterans in this country. Would a proper apology from Japanese politicians or their Emperor, so long after the event, be "meaningless"? Surely not.

Just as the absence of remorse can be a debilitating factor in relations between countries, so its heartfelt expression can help to heal old wounds. There is perhaps no more graphic example of this from modern history than West German Chancellor Willy Brandt kneeling before the memorial to the dead of the Warsaw Ghetto uprising in 1970.



Brandt wrote afterwards that, approaching the memorial, he felt that he

"had to do something to express the particularity of the commemoration at the ghetto monument. On the abyss of German history and carrying the burden of the millions who were murdered, I did what people do when words fail them."

Brandt had been an active member of a Socialist party when the Nazis came to power, and fled persecution in 1933. Unlike many Germans of his generation, then, he clearly could not be considered in any way responsible for the horrors visited on the rest of Europe by his compatriots; indeed, he had vocally opposed them at some risk to his own life. Was his famous act of contrition, therefore, "meaningless"? Again, surely not.

Modern political apologies may often be pointless or self-interested, and this latest example would certainly appear to be both, however worthy the cause. But that doesn't mean that they are so by definition. The evil that men do lives after them, and there are times when we need to acknowledge that as a nation. In the absence of the possibility of apology from those responsible for the original "crime", I would say that the office of the Prime Minister is an appropriate vehicle through which to say, this was wrong, it should not have been done, and we are sorry.

It's just a shame that the current incumbent of that debased office seems pathologically incapable of acknowledging the myriad mistakes for which he himself is responsible. I wonder if he ever will.

Labels: ,


Quote of the week


From Clive James' weekly "A Point of View" programme (which you can read here, or listen to here, should you wish):

It often seemed that Ken Livingstone had taken office in order to be controversial. Such was the level of controversy he continuously maintained that when he was replaced by Boris Johnson the new mayor's personality, which on any objective scale is like a hunt ball held in a cricket pavilion, has been experienced as a centre of calm.

This week's broadcast pays tribute to Sir Keith Park, hero of the Battle of Britain, and aims a few well-crafted barbs in the direction of Glenda Slagg wannabe Mary Wakefield, who wrote a column the previous week asking why he was having a statue erected in his honour, and indeed who the hell he was. Nor was la Wakefield the only one questioning the choice of Sir Keith for the fourth plinth in Trafalgar Square; when I tell you that one art critic described it over the weekend as "a fascist icon", the identity of the newspaper in question will not come as a surprise.

In his discussion of hacks and their right to parade their ignorance as public virtue, Clive James came up with an elegant variation on an old insult:

Right there, of course, is the catch in freedom. If you're born free you're free to think that freedom is a natural state, and free to think that your own freedom owes nothing to some gung-ho old dead guy with a rack of initials after his name.


But if Keith Park had never done what he did, our journalist might have had to compose her column in German, and you can bet that if she was writing about a statue of a Luftwaffe hero to go on the fourth plinth, her tone would have been lot more reverent.

James is not everyone's cup of tea, but A Point Of View is seldom less than engrossing, and I never miss an instalment. I commend it to you also.

Labels: , ,


Thursday, 12 November 2009

101 uses for a live frog...


...but I bet you never thought of this one.




(h/t: Carps)

Labels: ,